TOPIC:
13 Ottobre 2022
Laura C Coates, Josef S Smolen, Philip J Mease, et al.

Comparative performance of composite measures from two phase III clinical trials of ixekizumab in psoriatic arthritis

RMD Open. 2022 Sep;8(2):e002457
  • L’obiettivo dello studio è stato valutare i dati dei trial SPIRIT-P1 e SPIRIT-P2 sulla performance relativa delle misure composite dell’artrite psoriasica e determinare l’impatto del danno strutturale e della disabilità funzionale sugli obiettivi terapeutici con ixekizumab.
  • Un numero significativamente maggiore di pazienti trattati con ixekizumab ha raggiunto i target terapeutici a 24 settimane rispetto al placebo alle valutazioni con le misure composite.

Abstract

Background /objective
The aim of this study was to evaluate relative performance of composite measures in psoriatic arthritis and assess the impact of structural damage and functional disability on outcomes during ixekizumab treatment.

Methods
Data from SPIRIT-P1 and SPIRIT-P2 were analysed to evaluate the effect of ixekizumab on achievement of low disease activity (LDA) and remission with the minimal disease activity (MDA) and very low disease activity (VLDA) composite, Disease Activity index for Psoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA), Psoriatic Arthritis Disease Activity Score, GRAppa Composite ScorE and modified Composite Psoriatic Disease Activity Index (mCPDAI). Performance was compared by quantifying residual symptom burden and the impact of structural damage and functional disability.

Results
Significantly more ixekizumab-treated patients achieved treatment targets at week 24 versus placebo assessed with all composites. More patients achieved targets assessed by mCPDAI and DAPSA than other composites. Residual disease activity was similar between composites, but residual high patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and functional disability were more frequent when assessed with mCPDAI and DAPSA. Achievement of treatment targets was reduced by high baseline levels of structural damage and functional disability.

Conclusions
Residual disease activity was similar in patients achieving treatment targets assessed with all composites, but residual high PROs and functional disability were more common when assessed with mCPDAI and DAPSA, most likely due to the absence/attenuated functional assessment in these composites. High baseline levels of structural damage and functional disability attenuated response rates with all composites, affecting MDA/VLDA most prominently; LDA may be the most appropriate target in these patients.

Tagged on:
Scarica ppt Accedi all’abstract originale